They say Andy Burnham is ‘good at politics’ and Starmer was bad. That’s not trivial – it could be crucial | Zoe Williams
The PM-in-waiting brings the promise of likability and a mission voters can believe in. Politics needs ideas but also a set of skills: anyone who can't do the retail bit is doomed There is some uncertainty and trepidation in these liminal days before the nomination period for the next Labour leader opens. But it’s not about the “who” of the next prime minister so much as the “what”. How different can Andy Burnham be, given that he is bound by the same manifesto, assailed by the same headwinds? I
The PM-in-waiting brings the promise of likability and a mission voters can believe in. Politics needs ideas but also a set of skills: anyone who can't do the retail bit is doomed
There is some uncertainty and trepidation in these liminal days before the nomination period for the next Labour leader opens. But it’s not about the “who” of the next prime minister so much as the “what”. How different can Andy Burnham be, given that he is bound by the same manifesto, assailed by the same headwinds? It’s widely agreed that he has a vision where his predecessor did not, but each wing of Labour loyalists is projecting their own version of what it is.
Old-school Blairites are seeing one of their own, given Burnham’s hinterland and his announcement of James Purnell as his chief of staff. The Labour right is taking heart from the rumours of Shabana Mahmood as chancellor, and Josh Simons’ role in the policy team. The soft left is betting on Burnham’s transformation – via the Hillsborough scandal, the infected blood scandal, the geographical and economic inequalities of Covid – from New Labour careerist to a new kind of thinker. It feels churlish to point it out, but they can’t all be right.
Zoe Williams is a Guardian columnist
Continue reading...
Summary aggregated from The Guardian's public RSS feed. The full reporting belongs to The Guardian — please read it on their site.