Federal Court Hands Bunker Hill Mining Significant Summary Judgment Victory Over Crescent
Court dismisses Crescent’s federal CERCLA claims in their entirety, rejects its bid to force a mine dewatering, and bars years of its remaining claims as time-barred — while preserving Bunker Hill’s own claim to recover Crescent’s share of mine remediation costs Court dismisses Crescent’s federal CERCLA claims in their entirety, rejects its bid to force a mine dewatering, and bars years of its remaining claims as time-barred — while preserving Bunker Hill’s own claim to recover Crescent’s share
Court dismisses Crescent’s federal CERCLA claims in their entirety, rejects its bid to force a mine dewatering, and bars years of its remaining claims as time-barred — while preserving Bunker Hill’s own claim to recover Crescent’s share of mine remediation costs Court dismisses Crescent’s federal CERCLA claims in their entirety, rejects its bid to force a mine dewatering, and bars years of its remaining claims as time-barred — while preserving Bunker Hill’s own claim to recover Crescent’s share of mine remediation costs
Summary aggregated from GlobeNewswire's public RSS feed. The full reporting belongs to GlobeNewswire — please read it on their site.